SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Ori) 17

MOHANTY, NARASIMHAM
V. GURUMURTY RAJU – Appellant
Versus
V. NARASIMHA RAJU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.V.N.RAO, M.S.Rao, P.C.CHATTERJI

NARASIMHAM, J.

( 1 ) THESE two are analogous appeals from the order of the Subordinate Judge of berhampur in M. J. C. Nos. 109 of 1946 and 8 of 1947 setting aside an award made by an arbitrator named Sri T. N. Murthy on 15-9-1946.

( 2 ) FROM 1941 to 1944 one Narasimha Raju took lease of a rice mill belonging to the Maharaja of Parlakimedi by a registered lease deed dated 9-12-1940 (ext. 2)and subsequently admitted several other persons as partners for the management of the mill. The shares of the partners were fixed as follows:

V. Narsimha Raju J. Appa Rao 1/2 Y. Krishna Murty U. Samba Murty for D. Lakshman Murty 1/2 ? 2 " B. Dali Appana ? 1 " K. Ktishna Raju ? 1 " V. Gurumurty Raju ? 2 " 16 annas. ? 5 annas.   ? 2 " ? 2 "

 

The business of the partners consisted of milling rice and extracting oil from ground-nut. Some of the partners carried on another independent business in which their interests were as follows:

V. Narsimham Raju J. Appa Bao Y. Krishna Murty 1/2 ? 2 " U. Samba Murty for D. Lakshman Murty 1/2 ? 2 " V. Gurumurty Raju ? 2 " 16 annas. ? 5 annas.   ? 4 "

Y. Krishna Murty and U. Samba Murty retired from the partnership business and the o





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top