SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Ori) 43

P.V.B.RAO, MOHAPATRA
A. KRISHNA RAO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.MOHANTY, S.C.ROY

MOHAPATRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition has been filed by Sri A. Krishna Rao, a pleader practising in the court of the District Judge of Cuttack, who was the opposite party in --'state of orissa v. A. Krishna Rao', AIR 1955 Ori 46 (A) which was disposed of by a Special beach of this Court the Judgment being dated 29-4-1954. That was a reference made by the District Judge of Cuttack under 3. 14, Legal Practitioners Act, in a proceeding against the, pleader, Sri A. Krishna Rao, for having committed an act which was grossly improper in the discharge of his professional duty, in the judgment D/- 29-4-1954, the Special Bench found the pleader clearly guilty of gross misconduct in the discharge of his professional duty and, as such, he is liable to disciplinary action under the Legal Practitioners Act. But on account of the reason that the pleader is an inexperienced junior lawyer an order of reprimand was thought adequate to meet the ends of justice. The Special Bench, however, ordered the pleader to pay the costs of the reference and assessed the hearing fee at Rs. 100/ -. It is against this order for payment of cost the present petition has been filed by Mr. Mohanty on behalf of the pleade











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top