SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Ori) 45

NARASIMHAM, DAS
LAXMI DEBI – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA KUMAR PANDA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Mohapatra, B.N.Misra, C.M.ACHARYA, G.JENA, H.MOHAPATRA, M.S.Rao, U.C.MISRA, V.PASAYAT

DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit by her for declaration of her reversionary right in respect of the properties left by one Brajamohan Praharaj mohapatra, the last male-holder and for a further declaration that defendant 1 is not the adopted son of the said Brajamohan. Plaintiff Js the lull sister of brajamohan who died on 3-12-43 leaving behind him three widows who are defendants 2, 3 and 4. Defendant 1 is alleged to be the adopted son of Brajamohan; the adoption having been made by the widows after his death on the basis of an authority given by him during his life time. The plaintiff thus challenged the validity of the adoption and prayed for a declaration that defendant 1 was not the adopted son of Brajamohan. It is further averred in the plaint that Brajamohan had a son and a daughter who predeceased him. Defendants 2 and 3 in their written statement not only supported the adoption of defendant I, but also stated that Brajamohan left a daughter named Basanti born to him through defendant 2 and that she was still alive. Accordingly they challenged the right of the plaintiff-appellant to institute the present suit on the ground that she was not th

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top