SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Ori) 38

R.L.NARASIMHAM, P.V.B.RAO
BHIMSEN GOCHHIKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.MOHANTY

R. L. NARASIMHAM, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by one of the sebaks of the Temple of Lord Jagannath at Puri, known as Pratihari, for a declaration that the Shri Jagannath Temple Act (1954 (Act 11 of 1954), (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is ultra vires the State Legislature and not capable of being given effect to.

( 2 ) THIS petition was heard along with O. J. C. , No. 321 of 1955 : (AIR 1959 Orissa 5) (A) in which the Raja of Puri challenged the validity of the Act. Most of the constitutional questions have been fully discussed in my judgment in that petition which has been delivered today. Mr. M. Mohanty on behalf of the petitioners, laid special emphasis on the fact that the Temple of Sri Jagannath at Puri (hereinafter referred to as the Temple) belongs to a special sect of Hindus known as the followers of "jagannath Dharma" who form a separate denomination of their own, within the meaning of Article 26 of the Constitution. This question has been fully discussed in my judgment in O. J. C. , 321 of 1955 : (AIR 1959 Orissa 5) (A) and it is unnecessary to repeat it here.

( 3 ) A few special points that were taken up in this petition








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top