SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Ori) 37

G.C.DAS, S.BARMAN
GOKULANANDA PRAHARAJ – Appellant
Versus
JOGESH CHANDRA ROUT AND ANR. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.DAS, D.CHANDRA SAHU, R.K.MOHAPATRA, R.MISHRA, S.N.MITRA, SRINIBAS MISRA

S. BARMAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from an order of the Election Tribunal, Puri (Shri T. V. Rao, member, Election Tribunal) dismissing the election petition, on contest, against the respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the Congress candidate) and ex parte against the respondent No. 2 (hereinater referred to as the Independent candidate ).

( 2 ) THE relevant facts, shortly stated, are these: In the last General Elections, the appellant (hereinafter referred to as the Socialist candidate) as well as the respondents 1 and 2 filed their nomination papers from the Banki Constituency (District Cuttack) for being candidate for the Orissa Legislative Assembly. At the scrutiny, an objection was taken on behalf of the Congress candidate to the effect that the Independent candidate was a per on not qualified to stand for the election on the ground that he had an interest in a contract for the supply of goods and performance of services to the Government of Orissa. The said objection was, however, overruled and the nomination paper of the Independent candidate was accepted as valid by the Returning Officer on scrutiny.

( 3 ) SO the contest at the election commenced as. triangular














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top