SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Ori) 13

S.BARMAN
A. MAHALAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
PAMMI GARAMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.SEN, N.V.RAMDAS

S. BARMAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against an order of the Munsif, Berhampur, in Title Suit no. 224 of 1954 holding that the plaintiff is not precluded from raising the question of title in this suit and the suit is not barred by res judicata.

( 2 ) THE matter arose in this way: In 1949 the plaintiff, opposite party in the present revision petition, filed a suit being T. S. No. 151/49 (60/50 B. D. M. O.)hereinafter referred to as the first instituted suit, in the Court of the Munsif, berhampur, for among other reliefs, permanent injunction, restraining the defendants from doing certain acts as stated in the plaint of that suit.

( 3 ) THE following issues, amongst others, were raised in the said first instituted suit: "1. Whether the plaintiff succeeded to the suit schedule properties as the sole owner and has been in enjoyment and possession of the same; 2. Whether the suit properties are the Stridhan properties of late akkamma and devolved upon the defendants and whether the defendants are in possession and enjoyment of the same. " On 18-21951 the said suit was dismissed by the Additional Munsif, Berhampur. The learned Additional Munsif in his judgment gave his findi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top