SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Ori) 66

R.L.NARASIMHAM, G.C.DAS
RAMAKRUSHNA PADHY – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH CHANDRA DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.DAS, S.MOHANTY, SRINIBAS MISRA

R. L. NARASIMHAM, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the Patna High Court (which is applicable to Orissa by virtue of the Orissa High Court Order 1948)against the judgment (in appeal) of a single Judge of this Court in Miscellaneous appeal No. 81 of 1956. That appeal was filed against the appellate judgment of the Commissioner of Hindu Religious Endowments, Orissa (hereinafter referred to as the Commissioner) passed under Section 44 of the Orissa Hindu Religious endowments Act 1951 (Orissa Act No. II of 1952 --hereinafter referred to as the new Act) dismissing an appeal against the order of the Assistant Commissioner of hindu Religious Endowments Orissa (hereinafter referred to as the Assistant commissioner) passed under Section 41 of that Act declaring a particular religious institution to be a public one and one Ramesh Chandra Das and his agnates to be the hereditary trustees of the same. A preliminary objection was taken to the entertainability of this appeal on the ground that the judgment of the single Judge was passed in second appeal and that consequently by virtue of clause 10 of the Letters Patent a further appeal to a division Bench of






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top