SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Ori) 63

S.P.MOHAPATRA, S.BARMAN
K. RAJA GOPAL RAO – Appellant
Versus
DOLGOBINDA SAHU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.K.Mishra, M.S.Rao

S. P. MOHAPATRA, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANT No. 2, who was a claimant in a proceeding under Order XXI, Rule 58, c. P. C. has brought this second appeal against the judgment and decree-dated 262-1954 of Sri K. C. Mohapatra, Subordinate Judge of Cuttack, dismissing the appeal on. a preliminary issue as the persons vitally interested in the appeal were not made party-respondents.

( 2 ) THE suit out of which the present appeal arises was one under Order XXI, Rule 63, C. P. C. the plaintiff being the decree-holder who was unsuccessful in the Claim case brought by the present defendant No. 2, appellant, under Order XXI, Rule 58 c. P. C. The plaintiff and defendant No. 4 obtained a money decree on 23-2-1943 for a sum of Rs. 3582/8/3, when the properties in suit were attached by the plaintiff, a claim was put forth by the present defendant No. 2, which being allowed the plaintiff brought, the suit.

( 3 ) DEFENDANT No. 1 is the judgment-debtor. Defendants 3 and 3-Ka are the zamindars. Defendant No. 4 is the joint decree-holder along with the plaintiff. The plaintiff's case is that defendant No. 1, the judgment-debtor, made a wilful default in the payment of rent and being in collusion with the z








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top