SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Ori) 19

S.BARMAN
GOBIND CHANDRA SAMBARSINGH MOHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
UPENDRA PADHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.K.Mishra, H.MOHAPATRA, R.N.MISRA

S. BARMAN, J.

( 1 ) IN this second appeal, the defendant is the appellant from a decision of the learned Subordinate Judge, Balasore, confirming a decision of the learned Munsif of Bhadrak in a suit for damages filed by the plaintiffs-respondents for malicious prosecution.

( 2 ) THE matter out of which this case arose was a criminal case filed by the defendant-complainant against the plaintiff-accused under Sections 392 and 323, Indian Penal Code. Plaintiff No. 1 was the uncle of plaintiff No. 2 and they were living jointly. They were the Sevayats of the famous deity Akhandaleswar at Aradi in the district of Balasore. It appears that since before the date of the incident there were both criminal and civil litigations between the defendant-complainant and the plaintiffs-accused with the result that feelings between the parties were embittered and the alleged animosity of the defendant-complainant against the plaintiffs-accused is stated to be the genesis of the criminal case in which the defendant was the complainant against the accused plaintiffs. On 25-10-1951 the defendant-complainant lodged First Information Report recorded by the A. S. I. P. W. 2 in charge of the local police










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top