SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Ori) 90

G.C.DAS
SURYAMANI SAHU – Appellant
Versus
DARSANI SAHU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.K.DAS GUPTA, P.KAR, R.C.MISRA, R.N.MISRA

G. C. DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is by the plaintiffs against an order of the learned Subordinate judge of Balasore, calling upon them to pay additional court-fee.

( 2 ) THE facts are these. Plaintiffs filed a suit for partition each claiming one-fifth share in the joint family properties. According to them, their father, defendant No. 1, had alienated certain properties in the name of some of the defendants. They further stated that the several deeds of alienations were not acted upon and accordingly they paid a court-fee of Rs. 150/- as required in a pure suit for partition. The value of the properties involved is Rs. 1,69,285. 64 np. The peripatetic stamp reporter after a closer examination of the plaint reported that the plaintiffs were liable to pay court-fee under Section 7 (iv) (c) of the Court-fees act in respect of the properties covered under various alienations, because according to him the properties covered by the transfers' cannot be partitioned unless the transfers are set aside. The learned Subordinate Judge came to the conclusion that the plaintiff must separately value the properties covered by various transfer-deeds as also the property allotted to defendant 2





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top