SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Ori) 25

S.BARMAN
KHATI – Appellant
Versus
MIRZA HOSSAIN BEG – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.K.DAS GUPTA, M.S.Rao, S.N.DAS GUPTA

S. BARMAN, J.

( 1 ) THE defendants are the appellants, in this second appeal, from a confirming decision of the learned First Additional Subordinate Judge of Cuttack whereby be affirmed a decision of the learned Additional Munsiff of Cuttack and decreed the plaintiffs' suit for a declaration that lots 1, 2 and 3 of the suit properties are Wakf properties and that the mortgage and the execution are collusive.

( 2 ) THE facts, shortly stated, are these: The suit properties were purchased by one kamiruddin Khan being the predecessor-in-title of the defendants appellants in execution of a mortgage decree in T. S. No. 244 of 1927. On October 10, 1929 the said Kamiruddin Khan took delivery of possession in execution of the decree. In 1953 the present suit was filed by the plaintiffs, being members of Muslim community in their respective capacity, for a declaration that the suit property belongs to Mohamadan public and not the defendants and further that the mortgage in favour of the said Kamiruddin Khan (husband of defendant No. 1), the mortgage decree the execution proceedings are illegal, fraudulent and inoperative against the public and for possession. The defence taken in the suit,






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top