SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Ori) 63

R.K.DASH
BAIDI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SINGRAI MURMU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C.CHATTERJI, R.N.SINHA

R. K. DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiff's second appeal directed against an order dated 9-3-1959 of sri S. K. Mahapatra, District Judge, Balasore, in M. A. No. 77 of 1957, setting aside an order dated 3-8-1957 of Sri N. Sarangi, Addl. Munsif, Balasore, in O. S. No. 84/257 of 1957/54.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff brought a suit for setting aside a sale deed dated 11-4-1946 executed by his father in favour of the father of defendants 1 to 1 (kha) and husband of 1 (ga) as well for recovery of possession together with mesne profits. The case of the plaintiff's is that the sale deed was without consideration and legal necessity and the same was executed at a time when he was a minor and as such it is not binding and is inoperative against him. The plaintiffs further claimed that he was in possession of the suit property in spite of the sale deed till 23-2-1951 when he was dispossessed. Defendants 1 to 1 (ga) are the only contesting defendants. There is no relief sought against defendants 2 to 8, but they have been added as parties as the plaintiff wanted the case to be heard in their presence. The said defendants were also ex parte from the beginning.

( 3 ) THE case of the contesting defendan







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top