SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Ori) 58

R.L.NARASIMHAM, R.K.DASH
KHETRAMOHAN BARAL – Appellant
Versus
RASANANDA MISRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Mohapatra, H.N.DAS, L.K.DAS GUPTA, L.MOHANTY, R.N.SINHA, S.MISRA, V.PASAYAT

NARASIMHAM, C. J.

( 1 ) THESE four second appeals were heard analogously and will be disposed of in one judgment. They arise out of the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Judge of Cuttack-Dhenkanal confirming the judgment and decree of the Munsif, Second Court, Cutback, in four suits as described in the chart below : number of suit in the trial court. 1 number of the appeal before the Addl. District judge. Number of Second appeal before the high Court o. S. No. 208/50 o. S. No. 209/50 o. S. No. 210/50 o. S. No. 212/50 t. A. 41/56 t. A. 42/56 t. A. 43/56 t. A. 45/56 s. A 68/1959 s. A. 69/1959 s. A. 70/1959 s. A. 72/1959

( 2 ) IN the trial Court O. S. Nos. 208, 210, 211 and 212 of 1950 were all disposed of by one judgment. Though they were all tried analogously with T. S. No. 209 of 1950, a separate judgment was however delivered in T. S. No. 209 of 1950 by the learned Munsif. Five separate decrees were prepared in respect of all the aforesaid title suits. Five appeals were filed against the judgments and decrees of the learned Munsif and all the five appeals (Title appeals 41 to 45 of 1956) were disposed of by the lower appellate Court by one judgment and five s





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top