SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Ori) 26

R.L.NARASIMHAM
CHAKRA BEHERA – Appellant
Versus
BALAKRUSHNA MOHAPATRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.KANUNGO, R.N.MOHANTY, S.C.MOHAPATRA

R. L. NARASIMHAM, C. J.

( 1 ) THE five petitioners were convicted under Section 298 I. P. C. and sentenced to a fine of Rs. 15/- each by the S. D. M. of Talcher, on the allegation that with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of the villagers in Kandhala alias Ramchandrapur they offered Balis and worshipped two of the deities, namely, brahmani Dei and Pitabali Dei on inauspicious days.

( 2 ) THE aforesaid deities were established in the village long ago and it appears that the descendants of the original Brahmin families who were brought here from puri claimed a special right to manage the affairs of the said deities. It was also alleged that according to a long standing tradition and custom, animal sacrifices used to take place before the said deities only twice a year, once in the month of chaitra and again in the month of Bhadrab. The actual dates for performing animal sacrifices were also fixed by the Brahmins after discussion in a Sabha. It was further alleged that the dates as fixed by the Brahmins in the Sabha were final and no other villager was entitled to fix any other date, in pursuance of this age-old practice Bali was offered before the deitie









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top