SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Ori) 11

S.BARMAN
PRAHLAD CHARAN PANDA – Appellant
Versus
SALESWAR MAHADEV – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.PATNAIK, R.N.SINHA

S. BARMAN, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANT No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the mortgagee) is the appellant, in this second appeal, from a reversing decision of the learned 1st Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuttack, whereby he set aside a decision of the Additional Munsif of Jajpur, and decreed the plaintiffs' suit in the circumstances hereinafter stated.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF No. I is a deity called Sri Saleswar Mahadey, plaintiff No. 2 and defendants 2 to 4 are members of a joint Hindu family who are marfatdars of the said deity plaintiff No. 1. Schedule Ka properties, mentioned in the plaint, are stated to be the absolute Debottar properties of the deity plaintiff No. 1-Schedule Kha properties are said to be the ancestral joint family properties of plaintiff No. 2 and defendants 2 to 4.

( 3 ) THE plaintiffs' case, shortly stated, was this : On March, 1948, defendants 2 to 4, by a conditional sale deed (Ext. A), transferred the disputed properties mentioned in Schedule Ka and Kha to defendant No. 1 (appellant herein) by way of mortgage by conditional sale for a consideration of Rs. 300/ -. In 1950, defendants 2 to 4 brought a suit for redemption of the said mortgage being Title Suit No. 309/195









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top