SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Ori) 55

S.BARMAN, G.K.MISRA
BANKABEHARI DAS – Appellant
Versus
CHITTARANJAN NAIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.V.MURTHY, G.DAS, G.RATH, S.K.Kundu, S.MISRA

BARMAN, J.

( 1 ) THE election to the Orissa Legislative Assembly of the Respondent Chittaranjan naik from Binjharpur constituency in the mid-term election held in June, 1961 was challenged by the petitioner (appellant herein) Bankabehari Das, one of the defeated candidates, on several grounds stated in the election petition.

( 2 ) OUT of the numerous grounds on which the election of the respondent was challenged, the peti-tioner confined himself to only a few grounds so far as this appeal is concerned. The only grounds on which the petitioner relies herein are shortly stated these ; that the respondent was disqualified for the membership of the; State Legislature under Section 7 (e) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by reason of his having been the Managing Director of kalinga Foundry Ltd. at Dhenkanal in the district of Cuttack in which the government of Orissa is said to have majority shares in the capital; that the respondent committed certain corrupt practices of bribery after the nomination and before the date of election --all as stated in the election petition. The petitioner confined himself to only three instances of alleg


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top