SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Ori) 39

G.K.MISRA
GANESH MAHANTA – Appellant
Versus
SUKRIA BEWA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.MOHANTY, H.G.Panda, M.M.SAHU, P.K.PATNAIK, Y.S.N.MURTY

G. K. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) DEFENDANTS 3 to 5 are the appellants. The following geneology would show the relationship of the parties. GORACHAND MOHANT=lata (widow)| __________________________________________ | | | Sukria Nali (D-1) Nilamoni plff-1 =genesh (D-3) | | ______________________ | | | dharmu (D-2) Purna (Plff-2) Pratap (Plff-3)Plaintiffs filed the suit for partition claiming one third share for plaintiff 1, one-third for plaintiffs 2 and 3 and one-third for defendant 1. The disputed properties belonged to Gorachand. On his death his widow Lata inherited these properties as a limited owner. On 8th May, 1946, she executed a registered deed of gift in favour of defendant No. 2 in respect of Schedules B/1 and B/2 of the plaint and delivered possession. Plaintiffs filed original suit No. 138 of 1946-47 in the Court of the Munsif of Baripada challenging the alienation and obtained a declaration that it was not binding on their reversionary right beyond the life time of the widow. As both the Courts below have decreed the suit for partition in respect of the entire properties and as there is no dispute amongst the parties that schedules B/2 to b/4 are liable to partition, the history














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top