R.L.NARASIMHAM, S.BARMAN
GOLAB RAY – Appellant
Versus
MURALIDHAR MODI – Respondent
NARASIMHAM, C. J.
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by defendants 1 and 2 against the judgment of the Second additional Subordinate Judge, Cuttack, decreeing the plaintiff's suit for specific performance.
( 2 ) THE property involved in this litigation consists of valuable house property in the heart of Cuttack town which originally belonged to defendant No. 1 Shri Nikunja kishore Das. The plaintiff alleged that on 14-8-1957 defendant No. 1 entered into a binding contract with him to sell the property for Rs. 38,000/- but as the Khasmahal is the landlord of the site, it was further agreed between the parties that a deed of contract would also be executed and duly registered, by defendant No. 1 with a view to facilitate the obtaining of permission from the Khasmahal for the transfer of the property in favour of the plaintiff.
( 3 ) BUT according to the plaintiff the agreement, between the parties that a deed of contract would be executed later on did not in any way defraet from the finality of the contract entered into between the parties on 14-8-1957. In pursuance of the contract, stamp paper for Rs. 1. 8. 0, was purchased and the help of the Advocate for defendant No. 1 named Sri S. N. Da
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.