SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Ori) 12

R.K.DASH
NABAN BEWA – Appellant
Versus
NABAKISHORE SAMAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.MOHANTY, B.B.MOHANTY, N.C.PATNAIK, N.MUKHERJEE, S.K.DUTTA, V.PASAYAT

DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a defendant's appeal against the reversing judgment of the Additional district Judge of Cuttack, arising out of a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession.

( 2 ) THE disputed land measuring 16 decimals forms part of plot No. 1082 which comprises a total area of 24 decimals. The land originally was the Nijjote land of the zamindar Umesh Chandra Roy, who by an unregistered patta Ext. 1 dated 7-445 settled the land in favour of the plaintiff. According to the plaintiff he cultivated the suit land on Bhag for a period of about 15 years prior to the execution of Ext. 1 and he also continued to remain in possession after Execution of Ext. 1 and had acquired an occupancy right therein. The defendant who was in possession of eight decimals of his homestead towards the south-west of the said plot, being instigated by the enemies' of the plaintiff created trouble in the possession of the plaintiff for which a proceeding under Section 145 Cr. P. C. was started in which the plaintiff was the first party and the defendant was the second party. In the said proceeding the possession of the defendant having been declared on 17-9-56, the plaintiff has filed t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top