SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Ori) 52

R.K.DASH, R.L.NARASIMHAM
RAGHUNATH CHOUDHURY – Appellant
Versus
BUDHI NAIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.PAL, BIJOY PAL, D.P.MOHAPATRA, G.B.PATNAIK, R.C.PATNAIK, R.N.MISRA

NARASIMHAM, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a defendant's appeal against the concurrent decisions of the two lower courts decreeing the plaintiffs suit and declaring that a sale deed executed by the plaintiff on 28-1-1958 for Rs. 500/- in favour of the defendant was invalid and did not convey any title. The plaintiff belongs to Tanla caste in the sub division of nayagarh which was a former Feudatory State of Orissa. He was in possession of the disputed property as Tokari Jagiri land.

( 2 ) IT was found by the two lower courts that on 28th January 1958 he executed a sale deed con-veyingi the said property to the defendant for a sum of Rs. 500/ -. The defendant is admittedly a high caste Hindu. Though the two lower courts held that the sale deed was validly executed and there was consideration, they nevertheless held that the transaction was invalid on account of contraven tion of rule 3 of the Nayagarh Land Transfer Rules. That Rule reads as follows:

"3. No land or other immoveable property of an aboriginal or a person of low caste, specially Pans, Haris, and Khonds, will be sold, mortgaged, or leased put to ryots of high class without the written sanction of the State authority. Note: For th









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top