SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Ori) 91

R.L.NARASIMHAM, R.K.DASH
STATE OF ORISSA – Appellant
Versus
BAISHNAB SAHU – Respondent


NARASIMHAM, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from the award given by the Arbitrator, Hirakud Land organisation, fixing the amount of compensation payable to the respondents for the acquisition of their lands in village Lapang now submerged in the artificial lake formed by the construction of the Hirakud Dam accross the river Mahanadi. The total extent of the lands acquired is 13. 39 acres. The lands consisted of (1) Bahal or first class paddy-lands 9. 07 acres : (2) Berna or second class paddy-lands 2. 52 acres, and (3) Mal or 3rd class paddy-lands -- 1. 80 , acres.

( 2 ) THE lands were acquired under the provisions of Orissa Act XVIII of 1948. Section 7 (1) (e) of that Act says that in fixing the amount of compensation payable, to dispossessed owners, the Arbitrator shall have regard of the provisions of Sub-section (1) of Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act while estimating the" market value. But the second proviso to Clause (e) of Sub-section (1) of Section 7 of the Act says that where tinder any law or custom the lands acquired are not saleable the market value of such lands shall be such multiples as may be prescribed of the deduced rent to be calculated in the prescribed ma















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top