S.BARMAN
RASI DEI – Appellant
Versus
BIKAL MAHARANA – Respondent
S. BARMAN, J.
( 1 ) DEFENDANT No. 3 in a partition suit is the appellant from an order of the learned subordinate Judge Cuttack, whereby he appointed an outsider as receiver in respect of the suit agricultural lands.
( 2 ) IN May, 1963, the plaintiffs filed the suit for a decree for partition of their respective shares. The total area of the suit lands is said to be 5. 656 acres. The defendants are said to be members of a joint Hindu family. The 11 plaintiffs are each purchaser for a specific portion of property from different members of the defdts' family. The total acquisition of the plaintiffs by purchase is said to be 3 acres. On the plaintiffs' application for receiver the learned Subordinate Judge appointed one Sri Dibakar Jena of Souri Gram Punchayet as receiver. Hence this misc. appeal filed by defdt No. 3.
( 3 ) THE learned Subordinate Judge did not give any reasons for his appointing the receiver. His order, which is cryptic, is this: "26. 4-1-64. Parties file haziras. Heard lawyers at length on the Receiver matter. Let Sri Dibakar Jena of Souri Gram Puchayet be appointed as a receiver in respect of the agricultural lands till the disposal of the suit. Let a copy of or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.