SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Ori) 33

R.K.DASH
ADHIKARI NARAYANAMMA – Appellant
Versus
ADHIKARI THABITINAIDU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.SAHU, Y.S.N.MURTY

R. K. DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiff's appeal against the concurrent decisions of the Courts below, arising out of a suit for declaration of title, and recovery of possession and for mesne profits.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF is the wife of the defendant. Their marriage on 6-3-1952 is admitted. Plaintiffs case is that at the time of the marriage, her husband the defendant gifted the suit-property to her out of love and affection and later on executed the deed of gift (Ext. 1) which was duly registered and delivered to the plaintiff and she was in enjoyment of the property until 1956 when the defendant deserted her and unauthorisedly occupied the suit land. Hence the plaintiffs suit for the reliefs aforesaid.

( 3 ) THE defendant denied the gift, though he admitted the execution and registration of the deed of gift. His case, however, is that before the marriage of the plaintiff, her father demanded five Tolas of gold from the defendant who agreed to give the same within twenty days of the marriage. As the defendant was unable to arrange the gold, the plaintiff's father did not allow her to come to the house of the defendant. Under permission of the plaintiff's father, the defendant agreed









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top