SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Ori) 57

G.K.MISRA, R.L.NARASIMHAM
NOWRANGLAL AGARWALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C.PATNAIK, R.K.GHOSH, R.N.MISRA

NARASIMHAM, C. J.

( 1 ) THESE eight references were made by the Member, Sales Tax Tribunal, Orissa under Section 24 (1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947.

( 2 ) THE petitioner assessee is a registered cloth dealer of Cuttack town. While submitting his taxable turnover for eight quarters ending 30-6-55, 30-9-55, 3112-1955, 31-3-1956, 30-6-1956, 30-9-1956, 31-12-56 and 31-3-1957, the assessee claimed certain sums as permissible deductions being sales to registered dealers of goods intended for resale in Orissa--See Section 5 (2) (A) (a) (ii) of the orissa Sales Tax Act. The Sales Tax Officer refused to allow such deductions holding that he entertained serious doubts about "truth" of the declaration made by the purchasing dealer as required by Rule 27 (2) of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules. Eight appeals were filed before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax. Four of them were heard by one Shri L. C. Sahu who confirmed the order of the sales Tax Officer and dismissed the appeals in respect of the assessments for four quarters, ending 30-6-1955, 31-12-1955, 31-3-1956 and 30-6-1957. As regards the assessment for the remaining four quarters^ the appeals against the orders of th

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top