SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ori) 42

G.K.MISRA, R.K.DASH
HADI KIRSANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.Mohapatra

MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant has been convicted under Section 302 I. P. C and sentenced to imprisonment for life- He is the eldest son of the deceased and used to slay with him. In the evening of 5-5-63. the deceased was preparing tobacco. The appellant wanted a little of it Not only the deceased refused to give a portion but he gave him a kick by way of admonition Appellant thereafter went to the house of his uncle (P. W 1 ). He by then possessed a bow, two arrows and a dart. He narrated the story to P. W. 1 as to how and why he was assaulted by his father. A tittle later, the deceased came towards them and asked the son to come back home saying that he would not assault him further. At this point of time the appellant shot the father with an arrow which pierced his left fore-arm and the right belly. Hardly had he gone a few steps back he fell down. P. W. 1 came to his help and pulled out the arrow. The deceased made a statement before P. Ws. 1 to 3 as to how he was shot by his son. He was removed to the Hospital where he died at about 5 p. m. on 15-5-1963, ten days after the date of occurrence.

( 2 ) BOTH in the committing court and Sessions Court, the plea of the appellant wa














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top