SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ori) 83

R.K.DASH
STATE – Appellant
Versus
UMA CHARAN RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.KANUNGO, R.N.MOHANTY

R. K. DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the State is directed against an order of the Sub-Divisional magistrate, Karanjia, dated 26-8-1964 acquitting the respondent of an offence under Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act.

( 2 ) THE respondent Uma Charan Ram owns a grocery shop at Jashipur in the district of Mayurbhanj. On 9-2-63, the Food Inspector (P. W. 1) inspected his shop and purchased samples of some cocoanut oil for the purpose of analysis and despatched the same in the usual course for examination by the Public Analyst with a view to find out if the said oil was pure or adulterated. He received a report (Ex. 4) from the Public Analyst saying that the sample of cocoanut oil was found to be adulterated. On receipt of Ex. 4, P. W. 1 filed a complaint (Ex. 5), after obtaining necessary sanction from the District Health Officer. On the basis of the complaint, cognizance was taken and the accused was tried for an offence under section 16 (a) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (Act XXXVII of 1954) (hereinafter described as 'the Act' ).

( 3 ) THE accused admitted that he sold the sample of cocoanut oil to the Food inspector, PW. 1. His plea was that the coco













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top