SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Ori) 76

G.K.MISRA
RATNAKAR DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.NARASIMHA, M.K.C.RAO, R.N.MISRA

G. K. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision arises out of G. R. Case No. 595 of 1963. It has a chequered career. Information to the police was given by the complainant on 28-3-63 about an occurrence of 27-3-63 at about 11 P. M. Police submitted a final report. On a protest being filed by the complainant, charge sheet under Sections 147/323 I. P. C. was called for against all the accused. The trial proceeded. On 4-3-64 Sri V. S. Rao, Magistrate, 1st Class, acquitted all the accused holding that the trial was illegal and without jurisdiction. The police did not challenge this order. In Cr. Rev. 167 of 1964 filed by the complainant, this order was quashed and the learned magistrate was directed to proceed with the trial in accordance with law. Though a Prosecuting Inspector is in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate has permitted an advocate of the complainant to conduct the case. In fact the main responsibility in the conduct of the case for the prosecution appears to be in the advocate engaged by the complainant. On 28-4-65 the advocate for the complainant filed an application making the following allegations-

(1) That in the above case the police having been gained over by the accus












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top