SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Ori) 37

G.K.MISRA
BANCHHANIDHI MAHARATHA – Appellant
Versus
SRINIBASS PAIKROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Nayak, R.C.PATNAIK, R.N.MISRA, S.K.RAY

G. K. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) BANCHHANIDHI Maharatha (Petitioner) filed a complaint on 25-11-64 under sections 147 and 379. I. P. C. against Srinibash Paikroy (opp. party-1) and 17 others alleging that at about 6 A. M. on 28-11-64 they cut away the paddy which ho grew on the disputed land, Petitioner's case is that he looked after the properties of Orami Math in village Orami in Khurda Sub-division and cultivated the lands of the said Math On the date of occurrence, while he was absent from the village, opposite party No. 1 with the help of a large number of persons forcibly cut away the paddy. The complainant was examined on oath under Section 200, Cr. P. C. on 27-11-64 The complaint petition was sent to the officer in charge, Khurda Police Station for enquiry and report under Section 202. Cr. P. C. The Officer-in-charge examined the witnesses on behalf of the complainant and some of the accused persons. He perused a registered sale deed executed by one luxmipriya Debi on 28-10-64 in favour of opposite party No. 1 The Officer-incharge submitted a report on 28 4-66 after giving notice to the accused. The report was to the following effect.

"srinibas Paikroy has purchased the alleged plot















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top