SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Ori) 35

G.K.MISRA
DANEYI GURUMURTY – Appellant
Versus
RAGHU PODHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C.PANDEY, L.SAHU, P.PALIT, Y.S.N.MURTY

G. K. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE second defendant is the natural mother of the first defendant who was a minor The disputed property belongs to defendant 1 and was inherited from his adoptive father. The adoptive parents of the first defendant are dead. The second defendant as guardian of the first defendant sold to the plaintiff homestead land of 9 x 150 cubits for Rs. 500/- on 6-6-57 by a registered sale deed Ex. 1. The sale was effected for repayment of mortagage dues under Kx. 2 dated 20-7-53 executed by the adoptive father of the first defendant in favour of one Bai mahapatrani. Plaintiff's case is that the possession of a portion of the land measuring 4 x 38 cubits (disputed portion) was not delivered. He accordingly brought the suit for recovery of the disputed portion, not delivered, or in the alternative for refund of Rs. 200/- out of the sale consideration representing the proportionate value of the disputed portion. Defendants 1 and 2 filed separate written statements. Defendant-1 contested the suit alleging that there was not legal necessity for the transfer, that defendanf-2 was not his guardian and that the plaintiff fraudulently purchased the homestead at a low price thoug













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top