SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Ori) 53

S.BARMAN, R.K.DASH
KHALI PANIGRAHI – Appellant
Versus
KAMALA DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.G.Mohapatra, G.RATH, S.MOHANTY

BARMAN, AG. C. J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal filed by the defendant arises out of a suit filed by the plaintiff-purchaser for specific performance of a contract for sale of a suit house in berhampur (Ganjam) town under an agreement by which the defendant agreed to sell the suit house to the plaintiff for consideration on the terms and conditions as mentioned in the said agreement. The plaintiff-purchaser's suit for specific performance was decreed in her favour. Hence this appeal by the defendant-vendor. The facts and circumstances in which the parties came to be involved in the litigation over the suit house are as hereinafter stated.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff Srimati Kamaja Devi and the wife of the defendant, Khali Panigrahi are stated to be intimate friends. It is said that the plaintiff approached the defendant a contractor, for construction of a house for the plaintiff and members of her family; that the defendant purchased Ac. 0. 05 cents of land in ward No. 24 of Berhampur Municipality being house No. 392 adjacent to Komapalli Crossing in court area and constructed a pucca house on the said site. After construction the defendant put the plaintiff in possession of the suit house in Januar















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top