MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE decretal order is that plaintiffs Nos. 1 and 2 and defendant No. 1 have Rs. / 4/6 interest each and plaintiffs Nos. 3 to 6 and defendant No. 2 have Rs.-/-/6 interest each in the joint family property left by Joydeb. Mr. Misra contends that plaintiff No. 1 and defendant No 1 are each entitled to Rs.-A/6 interest and plaintiffs Nos. 2 to 6 and defendant No. 2 are each entitled to Rs.-/-/8 Interest, thus the controversy in this appeal is confined only to fixation of shares Facts relevant to the aforesaid controversy need only be stated joydeb Naik died on 22-8-59. He hud three wives. The first wife had no issues ananda (defendant No. 1) and Jasoda (defendant No. 2) are the son and daughter respectively through his deceased second wife Labhanya, Ali Bewa (Plaintiff No. 2) is his third wife. Haribandhu (Plaintiff No. 1) is the son and plaintiffs Nos. 8 to ft are his daughters through plaintiff No. 2. Thus, Joydeb died leaving behind him his widow (Plaintiff No. 2), two sons (Plaintiff No. 1 and defendant No. 2) and five daughters (plaintiffs Nos. 3 to 6 and defendant No. 2) At the time of Joydeb's death, there was no disruption in the coparcenery consisting of himse