SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Ori) 21

R.K.DASH, G.K.MISRA
BANSHIDHAR BEHERA – Appellant
Versus
BHANI DEI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.MOHANTY, P.K.SENGUPTA, S.Acharya, S.K.RAY

MISRA, J.

( 1 ) LUXMAN Behera and Bida Behera were brothers. Luxman died in about 1910 leaving behind four daughters--Ani (defendant-2), Bhani (Plaintiff), Jatri (defendant-3) and Gura (who died long ago ). The entire disputed land consists of about 17 acres and is described in Schedule Ka of the plaint. Schedule Kha is 2. 69 acres and is a part of Schedule Ka. Schedule Ga constitutes a part of Schedule kha. Plaintiff's suit was for partition of Ka schedule property amongst the sisters in three equal shares excluding Kha schedule property, for declaration of title to Kha schedule property, for confirmation of possession of the Ga schedule property and for recovery of possession of Ka schedule property excluding Ga schedule. Defendant-1 if the natural born sou of Bida Behera. Defendants 1 (ka) to 1 (gha)are the sons of defendant-1. Plaintiffs case is that at the time of death of Luxman, she and her sisters were minon and the suit properties were looked after by Bida Behera who performed the marriage of the last two daughters and remarriages of all the four daughters. Bida Behera got the disputed properties fraudulently recorded in the name of defendant-1 in the settlement of 1322 V













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top