SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Ori) 37

G.K.MISRA
BUPDEO SANTHOLIA – Appellant
Versus
CUTTACK MUNICIPALITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Nayak, C.V.MURTHY, P.C.MISHRA, S.MISRA

G. K. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THAKURLAL Satholia (since deceased) was convicted under Section 16 (l) (a) of the prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and sentenced to a fine of Rs 300. As the appeal was filed by the son of the deceased, the appellate Court directed that he would not undergo any imprisonment in default of payment of fine, but the fine would be realised according to law.

( 2 ) ON 28-2-63 P. W. 1, the Food Inspector of Cuttack Municipality, inspected the grocery shop of the accused in Buxi Bazar within the municipal area of Cuttack city, He purchased a small quantity of Arhar dal suspecting it to be adulterated. A sample of the Arhar dal purchased was seized in presence of two witnesses -Vigilance inspector (P. W. 2) and the Sanitary Inspector (P. W. 3 ). The sample was divided into 3 parts and sealed in three empty bottles one of which was handed over to the accused. Out of the two bottles taken by P. W. 1, one was sent to the Public Analyst who reported that the sample contained colouring materials yellow (Coaltar dye present) and who was of opinion that the sample was adulterated as aforesaid colouring matter was prohibited for us










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top