G.K.MISRA
MANORANJAN SAMANTA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
BRUNDABATI VEERGAM – Respondent
G. K. MISRA, J.
( 1 ) BRUNDABATI (defendant-opposite party) is the widow of the maternal uncle of manoranjan (plaintiff-petitioner ). Brundabati filed an application under Section 488, Cr. P. C. on behalf of her minor son alleging that the latter was born to her through the petitioner. The parties are Indian Christians. In Criminal Revision No. 493 of 1962, this Court allowed the application under Section 488, Cr. P. C. and directed the petitioner to pay every month a sum of Rs. 20 to the opposite party for the maintenance of the minor son. Title Suit No. 24 of 1964 was filed by the petitioner in the Court of the First munsif, Cuttack, for a declarati on that the petitioner is not the father of brundabati's illegitimate son and that the minor is not entitled to recover any maintenance. Brundabati was arrayed as a defendant with the description "for herself and as representing her alleged illegitimate minor son". Thus though the name of the minor son was not given in the cause title, both Brundabati and her minor son through her as the guardian, were impleaded as parties. Notice of the suit was served on Brundabati who did not file the written statement in time. On 10-9-64 the peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.