SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Ori) 69

G.K.MISRA, R.N.MISRA
NIRANJAN SAHU – Appellant
Versus
NARASU SATPATHY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.PAL, B.Pal, N.B.K.Murty, N.V.RAMDAS

G. K. MISRA, C. J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner and opposite party No. 1 were candidates for election of sarpanch in the Golantha Gram Panchayat. The election was held on 3-6-67 and the results were published on 9-6-67. Opposite party No. 1 was declared elected. The petitioner filed an election petition under Section 31 of the Orissa Gram panchayat Act, 1964 (hereinafter to be called as the Act) for setting aside the election of opposite party No. 1 on the ground, amongst others, that he was disqualified under Section 25 (1), Clause (1) of the Act as he was a debtor to the aska Multipurpose Co-operative Society. The election petition was registered as misc. Case No. 109 of 1967. It was taken up for trial. After the close of the entire evidence the petitioner filed an application for further cross-examination of opposite party No. 1 himself with reference to a document which was called for earlier but produced subsequent to his examination on oath. The application was filed under Order 18, Rule 17 C. P. C. The learned Munsif was of opinion that Order 18, Rule 17 was not applicable to trial of election cases, and as such he had no power to grant the prayer. The petitioner filed an appeal be





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top