SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Ori) 20

R.N.MISRA
KRUSHNA CHANDRA PANI – Appellant
Versus
BALI SAHU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Mohapatra, R.C.PATNAIK, R.K.MOHAPATRA

R. N. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the plaintiff is directed against the concurrent decision of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Puri. The plaintiff had sued for title and possession in respect of a house standing on the disputed property and had claimed for recovery of arrears of house rent and damages all amounting to Rs. 96-25. Originally the plaintiff sued for recovery of arrears of rent only and had filed the suit in the S. C. C. Court. The defendant denied the plaintiff's title. Therefore, the plaint in the S. C. C. suit was returned and a comprehensive suit for title was instituted with a claim for the aforesaid reliefs.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff alleged that the disputed property which is 9 decimals was purchased by his mother and his parents were in possession of the property. After them he has succeeded to it. The defendant as a tenant is residing on plot No. 111 under Ananda Pani, As that accommodation was insufficient he asked the plaintiff to let out the house standing on the disputed property on monthly basis and the plaintiff accepted the defendant as a tenant with effect from 15-2-1962 at a rent of Rs. 250/- per month. The defendant is said to have paid rent















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top