SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Ori) 16

S.K.RAY
BANCHA BHOL – Appellant
Versus
SARIA BEWA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.SAHU, G.Sarangi, N.N.Swain, R.C.Ram

S. K. RAY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the defendants from the confirming decision of Sri R. C. Jena, subordinate Judge, Nayagarh, dated 7-11-69, passed in Title Appeal Nos. 36/28 of 1968, decreeing the plaintiff's suit.

( 2 ) THERE were two brothers, Hats and Nata. Plaintiff 1 is the widow of Nata who died on 18-6-64. Plaintiff 2 is his daughter. Defendants 1, 2 and 3 are the sons of hata, and defendant 4 is the minor son of defendant 2, In a partition between these two brothers, the properties described in Schedules Ka and Kha of the plaint, the total extent of which is 2. 50 acres, fell to the share of Nata. There was a maintenance proceeding under Section 488, Cr. P. C. by plaintiff 1 against her husband, Nata, in which the claim for maintenance was allowed. To satisfy the order for maintenance, Nata transferred Kha Schedule properties to his wife, plaintiff 1, and put her in possession on 17-10-47, and since then plaintiff' 1 is in possession, and by virtue of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, she has become the absolute owner of the same. Thereafter Nata executed a sale-deed in respect of ga Schedule properties in favour of defendants 1 to 3 on 20-11-52. On the same date he al













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top