A.MISRA
DINESH CHANDRA GUHA – Appellant
Versus
SATCHIDANANDA MUKHERJI – Respondent
A. MISRA, J.
( 1 ) PLAINTIFF is the appellant against a confirming judgment in a suit for specific performance of contract for sale. Originally, plaintiff prayed for specific performance of contract in respect of the properties described in Schedules A and b of the plaint, both of which are situate in Puri town. In the trial court, the claim, so far it related to the A schedule property, was given up, and the plaintiff confirmed his claim to the B schedule. Necessarily the subject-matter of this appeal relates to the B schedule property only.
( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiff, in brief is as follows: The disputed properties originally belonged to Umananda, Rhagendranath and others. In a partition suit of 1923, the a schedule land fell to the share of Khagendranath and his two brothers and the B schedule to Umananda. Thereafter, Umananda mortgaged the B schedule property to Nagendranath Mukherji, father of defendant Nos. 1 to 3. On 11-1-1935. Umananda sold a portion of the said land to one Kamalabala Dasi who in her turn sold the same to the original defendant No. 4 who died during the pendency of the appeal in the lower appellate court and was substituted by his legal representativ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.