SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Ori) 7

A.MISRA
DINESH CHANDRA GUHA – Appellant
Versus
SATCHIDANANDA MUKHERJI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.MOHANTY, R.N.SINHA

A. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF is the appellant against a confirming judgment in a suit for specific performance of contract for sale. Originally, plaintiff prayed for specific performance of contract in respect of the properties described in Schedules A and b of the plaint, both of which are situate in Puri town. In the trial court, the claim, so far it related to the A schedule property, was given up, and the plaintiff confirmed his claim to the B schedule. Necessarily the subject-matter of this appeal relates to the B schedule property only.

( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiff, in brief is as follows: The disputed properties originally belonged to Umananda, Rhagendranath and others. In a partition suit of 1923, the a schedule land fell to the share of Khagendranath and his two brothers and the B schedule to Umananda. Thereafter, Umananda mortgaged the B schedule property to Nagendranath Mukherji, father of defendant Nos. 1 to 3. On 11-1-1935. Umananda sold a portion of the said land to one Kamalabala Dasi who in her turn sold the same to the original defendant No. 4 who died during the pendency of the appeal in the lower appellate court and was substituted by his legal representativ















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top