SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Ori) 59

R.N.MISRA
RAJKISHORE PANDA – Appellant
Versus
HARIBANDHU MAHALA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.PATRA, R.Ch.Mohanty, RANJIT MOHANTY

R. N. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants applied for revocation of grant of probate at the instance of the respondents in Original Suit No. 1 of 1968, by the learned District Judge Balasore, on 22-8-1908, That application made on 9-12-68 was registered as Miscellaneous case No. 32 of 68 and though made under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil procedure, was treated as one under Section 203 of the Indian Succession Act. As the learned District Judge declined to revoke the probate, the appellants have come up in appeal to this Court.

( 2 ) ONE Juihesti Panda was alleged to have executed an unregistered will dated 173-1967 and died on 2-11-1967. The testator had 6. 69 acres of land. In terms of the testamentary disposition, the following three institutions were to benefit;- (1) Banitiya Middle English School through its Secretary Haribandhu mahalla; (2) Sri Ghateswar Mahadev through Marfatdar Gadadhar Dixit; and (3) Sri Ganes Jew Thakur of Banitiya through Marfatdars:-- (a) Harihar Panigrahi, (b) Mahendra Panda, (c) Gadadhar Dixit. On 22-12-1967, an application under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for probate of the aforesaid will was filed by Haribandhu Mahalla and Gadadha













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top