SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Ori) 55

S.K.RAY
KRUPASINGHU ROUTRA – Appellant
Versus
PURNA CHANDRA MISRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.Patra, S.C.SAHU

S. K. RAY, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal arises out of a suit for eviction of defendants 1 and 2 from the suit house where they had been inducted as tenants for realisation of arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 240/- for the period of 24-6-1963 till 26-8-1964 for declaration of plaintiff's right, title and interest in respect thereof and for a further declaration that the defendants 1 and 2 have acquired no interest in the suit house under a registered sale deed executed in their favour by defendant 3 and any pasinghu Routra and Anr. vs. Purna Chandra Misra and Ors. (19. 06. 1972 - ORIHC) Page 2 of 6 interest, if any acquired thereunder is ineffective against the plaintiff's interest.

( 2 ) THE land on which the suit house stands belongs to P. W. D. Defendants 3 and 4 who are brothers obtained lease of the land and constructed the suit house thereon and remained in possession thereof as owners. Subsequently defendant no. 3 alienated his moiety interest in the suit house to defendant 4, on 5-7-1959, who, in consequence thereof, became the full owner thereof. The defendant 4 in his turn sold the suit house to defendant 5. On 14-7-1959, and the latter sold it to the plaintiff on 9-2-196
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top