SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Ori) 50

B.K.PATRA, S.K.RAY
MAHADEB MAHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
SOVA DIBYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Mohapatra, R.K.MOHAPATRA

S. K. RAY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the defendant and arises out of a suit for partition of the suit land by metes and bounds and for putting the plaintiff in separate pos-session of her share.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs case is that her husband, Baleswar Mohapatra and the defendant were two brothers being the sons of one Kelu Mohapatra. This family had sufficient joint family nucleus with the aid of which some more immovable properties were acquired in the name of the defendant In 1944 the plaintiff's husband died, and thereafter, in the same year, the aforesaid acquisitions in the name of defendant were made. After the death of plaintiff's husband, the plaintiff and the defendant possessed jointly all the joint family properties till 1-10-62, when the dissensions arose between them. The defendant tried to get himself solely recorded during the settlement operation in respect of the properties purchased in his name by putting the plaintiff completely in the dark about it. Thereafter the plaintiff demanded partition but the defendant ignored it Hence this suit.

( 3 ) THE defendant adopted a number of defences. Of them, the material ones may be stated. First of all, the relationship







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top