LINGARAJA RATH
PIYUS EKKA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content so I can analyze it and generate the key points with the appropriate references.
LINGARAJA RATH, J.
( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of Sessions Trial No. 125/10 of 1981/85 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Sambalpur and hence are disposed of by this common judgment. Criminal Appeal No. 221/85 has been preferred by Piyus Ekka and Criminal Appeal No. 244/85 has been preferred by Tarkeswar Prasad Sah, Rambabu Sah and Harbans Singh. All the four appellants were made to stand trial u/s. 394/ 397, IPC and u/ss. 25 and 27 of the Indian Arms Act. Besides, appellant Rambabu Sah was also further charged under Ss. 279/337, IPC. They were convicted u/ S. 394 read with S. 397, IPC and sentenced to undergo R. I. for seven years each. All the appellants except Rambabu Sah were also convicted u/ss. 23 and 27 of the Indian Arms Act and sentenced to undergo R. I. for one year u/s. 25 and two years u/s. 27 of the Indian Arms Act. Rambabu Sah has also been convicted u/s. 337, IPC and sentenced to R. I. for six months and though he was convicted u/s. 279, IPC no separate sentence was passed. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
( 2 ) THE case against the appellants, as alleged by the prosecution, was that on 27-7-83 they hired a jeep bearing No. 058/4411 belo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.