SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Ori) 40

K.P.MOHAPATRA
BIRA KISHORE MOHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
SUNDAR BHOI BALI MUNDIA AND 5 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.NAIK, J.P.MISHRA

K. P. MOHAPATRA, J, J.

( 1 ) LEAVING aside technicalities, the petitioner in this Criminal Revision has challenged the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Sambalpur, refusing to summon opposite party nos. 1 to 5, take cognizance of offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 447 and 302 read with Section 149 I. P. C. and frame charges against them along with the other accused committed for trial for the selfsame offences.

( 2 ) ON 15-7-1988 at about 1. 30 p. m. murder of one Satyabrata Mohapatra was committed. The case was investigated and charge-sheet was submitted against 12 accused persons for having committed offences under Section 147, 148, 323, 447 and 302 read with Section 149 I. P. C. In due course, all of them were committed to the court of session for trial. Opposite party nos. 1 to 5 were not charge-sheeted and so there was no question of their commitment to the court of session. On 6-6-1989 a petitioner, was filed before the learned Sessions Judge stating therein that there are prima facie materials against opposite party nos. 1 to 5 and so they should be summoned so that charges can be framed against them along with the accused committed. The petition was rejected.

( 3 )




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top