SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ori) 156

ARIJIT PASAYAT
NAGENDRANATH ROY – Appellant
Versus
BIJOY KUMAR DASBURMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.K.MOHANTY, MIRA GHOSH, P.K.Lenka, P.K.PRADHAN, S.C.DAS GUPTA, SUDHAKAR MISRA

ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER calls in question correctness of order passed by learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate. Sadar, Cuttack (in short the 'sdjm') dismissing a complaint filed by him alleging that opp. parties herein committed mischief resulting in death of a calf and therefore, were liable to punished in terms of Section 429 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'ipc' ).

( 2 ) PETITIONER's complaint indicated following background:- a calf belonging to him suffered from ailment on 12-4-1986. As the ailment aggravated, opp. party No. 1 who is a Veterinary Doctor was called for rendering medical cheek up. Opp. party No. 1, after checking prescribed certain medicines and injections. The daughter of the complainant-petitioner objected to administration of prescribed injenction, since she felt that was risky to be administered, and requested the Doctor to prescribe some other medicine to be orally administered. He prescribed some pills which were given to the calf. On 14-4-1986 the calf suffered from another attack of fits. After examination of its stool, the next day the Doctor prescribed certain injections. This time injections were administered notwithstand



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top