SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ori) 111

D.M.PATNAIK
GAYADHAR OJHA ALIAS OJHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.MISHRA, DIPAK MISRA

D. M. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner having been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months u/s. 46 of the Orissa Forest Act, 1972 by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Anandapur and the same having been confirmed by the Sessions Judge, Keonjhar in appeal is in revision before this Court.

( 2 ) PROSECUTION case is, on 15-9-1984 at about 9 a. m. on the basis of a search warrant, the Forest Range Officer, Anandapur, along with the vigilance squad of the Forest Department carried on a raid in the premises of the petitioner and recovered and seized forest timbers (including logs and seized logs) numbering 666 pieces of different varieties such as Sal, Pia-sal etc. The petitioner failed to produce any authority for such possession. So prosecution report was submitted against him for violation of Ss. 27, 37 read with S. 46 of the Orissa Forest Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') and for violation of rules 4 and 16 of the Orissa Timber and other Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1980 and rule 3 of the Orissa Forest Saw Pits and Saw Mills (Control) Rules, 1980 (for short, 'the Timber Transit Rules' and 'the Saw Pits Rules' ). The total timber








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top