SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Ori) 74

S.C.MOHAPATRA
DHANESWAR MALLIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Mohapatra, DEBASHIS DAS, G.N.MAHAPATRA

S. C. MOHAPATRA, J.

( 1 ) A case rare in its nature having come to notice in this revision, the same is disposed of with reasons at the stage of admission.

( 2 ) CHAMPABATI lodged information in Jajpur Road Police-station that Dharanidhar (accused) and others kidnapped her daughter Kumari Minati on 5-9-1989 at about 10 a. m. in a car and at the time of interception by her two sons Padmalochan and Trilochan, they were threatend of assault by accused persons. Registering it as First Information Report, police conducted investigation. In course of investigation, petitioners were examined and their statements were recorded under S. 161, Cr. P. C. From these statements, it is revealed that petitioners were witnesses to occurrence. Charge-sheet having been filed against five accused persons, petitioners filed an application before learned Judicial Magistrate to record their statements under S. 164, Cr. P. C. , since they did not implicate accused Jitendra to have participated in the crime and investigating offficer with mala fides and ulterior motive mentioned in their statements about involvement of Jitendra.

( 3 ) FROM the impugned order it is seen that at instance of investigating o






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top