SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ori) 21

B.N.DASH, B.L.HANSARIA
GURUDEV SINGH RAI – Appellant
Versus
AUTHORISED OFFICER-CUM-ASST. CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K.Mohanty, N.BEHURIA, R.K.MOHANTY, R.K.Patra, R.MOHANTY, Raghunath Meher

HANSARIA, J.

( 1 ) TERSELY put, we have been called upon in this case to decide "whether the judiciary can also legislate; if so, when and to what extent?" The question as posed above may sound to many ears as novel, strange and a clear attempt to usrup the power of the legislature. But from what is being stated later, it would appear that it is not so.

( 2 ) THE aforesaid question, however, requires our examination because in this case a truck found involved in committing a forest offence was ordered to be confiscated by the Authorised Officer-cum-Assistant Conservator of Forests, which order having been affirmed in appeal, has been challenged in this Court. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we felt that on the facts of the case, confiscation of the truck is not merited and so we suggested that in lieu of confiscation we propose to impose fine. This suggestion was given keeping in view the judgments of this Court rendered in O. J. C. No. 3105 of 1988 (Narendra Singh v. Authorised Officer, disposed of on 15-11-1988), which was followed in O. J. C. No. 3265 of 1988 (N. V. Gopalaswamy v. Assistant Conservator of Forests) disposed of on 11-9-1990 and O. J. C. No.



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top