SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Ori) 59

B.N.DASH
HEMANTA KUMAR PRADHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.DAS, B.K.MISHRA, N.P.K.PATNAIK, S.B.PATNAIK

B. N. DASH, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Phulbani whereby he has uphold the judgment and order of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Phulbani convicting the petitioner under section 326, I. P. C. and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of three months.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case, briefly stated, is that on 9-8-1985 at about 11 a. m. while the injured Dirju Digal (P. W. 4) was returning to his village Dadigonda from village Karadi, the petitioner stopped him on the way and dealt axe blows causing incised injuries on his right arm and chest and, thereafter, forcibly removed away from the possession Rs. 790/ -. After receiving the injuries, P. W. 4 could manage to go to his village with difficult where he disclosed the incident to his son Jibardhan (P. W. 5), his wife (P. W. 7) and one Lankeshwar Digal (P. W. 10), who took them to Phulbani Sadar Police Station, where P. W. 5 lodged the F. I. R. , Ext. 3. In course of investigation the injured was examined by Dr. Arjuna Panda of Sadar Headquarters Hospita









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top