SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Ori) 81

ARIJIT PASAYAT
SK. BADAR ALIAS BADIRUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.DEO, B.S.TRIPATHY, DIPAK MISRA, P.PANDEY

ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.


( 1 ) PETITIONER Sk. Badar alias Badiruddin (hereinafter also referred to as the 'accused') calls in question legality of appellate judgment passed by the learned Second Addl. Session Judge, Puri finding his guilty of an offence punishable under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'ipc'), convicting him thereunder and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years, and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000. 00 in default to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months. The accused was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years by the Asst. Sessions Judge, Khurda. The petitioner stood trial along with twenty six others for having committed various offences and causing injuries on police personnel while they were discharging duties as public servants.

( 2 ) FACTUAL matrix as presented by the prosecution is as follows: On 15-1-1992 at about 8. 30 p. m. the officer-in-charge of Tengi Police Station along with several other police personnel went to village Dikhitpada by a private truck to execute pending H. S. We against some of the villagers of that village






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top