SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Ori) 73

R.K.PATRA
PREMJIT MOHAHANDA – Appellant
Versus
MOHANPANI KARUA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.DASH, A.K.SAHU, B.K.NAYAK, B.L.N.SWAMY, P.K.MISHRA, P.K.MOHANTY, S.DAS GUPTA, S.MOHANTY

R. K. PATRA, J.


( 1 ) THE petitioner is the complainant. He filed complaint vide I. C. C. No. 20 of 1993 in the court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rampur against opposite parties on the allegation that they committed offences punishable under Sections 342/323/294/506/34 IPC, Opposite party No. 1 was the Officer-in-charge of Rampur Police Station at the relevant time. The learned Magistrate after perusing the complaint, the initial statement of the petitioner and the statements of witnesses recorded in the enquiry under Section 202 Cr. P. C. held that the facts and circumstances of the case did not show that there was any connection of assault or use of abusive words at the petitioner by the opposite party no. 1 while the latter was discharging official duty. He was of the opinion that no action under Section 197 Cr. P. C. was necessary. Having found a prima facie case he took cognisance of offences under Sections 323/506/34 IPC and directed issue of summons to the opposite parties. This order was passed on 9-2-1994. The opposite party no. 1 challenged it before the learned Sessions Judge. By the impugned order, the learned Sessions Judge held that opposite party no. 1 is





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top